Could You Lose Your Right To Have a Vegetable Garden?
With all that is wrong in the world and our own ever changing interpretation of our own laws and rights you wouldn’t think something as benign as having a vegetable garden would be so controversial.
If gardening can be outlawed, then I guess there are no limits to what the government can do?
I could see it if the property owners were growing illegal or banned plants or of there was a huge safety issue because of careless or dangerous gardening practices. In this case, however, it appears to be none of them.
If all it takes is someone’s opinion to determine that you have or do not have the right to grow a garden, then I hope no one is paying attention to how some people are dressing.
I mean if there were a judge who didn’t like the color blue or t-shirts, then who knows if that in the near future these items could be banned because of an opinion? Not a law, but a personal opinion. What happened to the right to pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?!?
As impossible as this sounds, it is all to real. I can’t say it surprises me, but I am a little alarmed and very disappointed that this has been allowed.
Vegetable Garden Banned
“Last week, a Miami-Dade judge became the focus of much-deserved anger when she ruled on an ordinance banning front yard vegetable gardens.
The village of Miami Shores, according to the ruling, has every right to take legal action against residents who dare to grow food in their own yards because they are “ugly.”
The ruling was a whopping ten pages long as it was filled with legal analysis and definitions of what constitutes a vegetable.
Even though she ruled in favor of the ban, Judge Monica Gordo acknowledged that she wasn’t quite sure how a vegetable garden can ruin the aesthetics of one’s property.
However, she stated that the democratically elected government has every right to dictate what constitutes an ugly front yard, and gardens are apparently a contributing factor.
“Given the high degree of deference that must be given to a democratically elected governmental body … Miami Shores’ ban on vegetable gardens outside of the backyard passes constitutional scrutiny,” Gordo wrote.
The court’s decision was based on a three-year long legal battle of Tom Carroll and Hermine Ricketts. They were facing a fine of $50 a day, not for robbing banks, or trafficking humans, or running some other criminal enterprise — but for growing their own food.
For 17 years, the couple grew their own food in their front yard until one day, the state came knocking.
No one was harmed by the couple’s garden, it was entirely organic, and in nearly two decades, not one of their neighbors ever complained. The only injured party in this ridiculous act was the state.
According to the tyrannical legislation, all homeowners are subject to the same absurd constraints. Their yards must be covered in grass — that is the law.
“There certainly is not a fundamental right to grow vegetables in your front yard,” Richard Sarafan, attorney for Miami Shores, said at the start of the case. “Aesthetics and uniformity are legitimate government purposes. Not every property can lawfully be used for every purpose.”
While Ricketts and Carroll are upset over the ruling, the do not plan on backing down anytime soon.
“I am disappointed by today’s ruling,” Ricketts said in a statement to the Miami Herald.
“My garden not only provided us with food, but it was also beautiful and added character to the community. I look forward to continuing this fight and ultimately winning so I can once again use my property productively instead of being forced to have a useless lawn.”
According to the report in the Miami Herald:
The upscale village in Northeast Miami-Dade has long insisted it had every right to regulate the look of the community.
At a hearing in June, the village’s attorney said vegetable gardens are fine in Miami Shores, as long as they remain out of sight in the backyard.
“There is no vegetable ban in Miami Shores,” Sarafan told the judge. “It’s a farce. A ruse.” However, it’s not a farce. People cannot grow food in their front yards because the government thinks they are unsightly.
“They can petition the Village Council to change the ordinance. They can also support candidates for the Council who agree with their view that the ordinance should be repealed,” Gordo wrote.
However, that is what this couple has been doing for years. Changing the system from within has had zero effect.
The irony here is that had Carroll and Ricketts been growing their garden in the backyard, spraying gallons of glyphosate and permethrin into the air, the city would have been entirely fine with it.
Only when this innocent couple dares to grow food in their front yard, violating the “aesthetics and uniformity” of their control freak government, do they ever hear a word.
“If Hermine and Tom wanted to grow fruit or flowers or display pink flamingos, Miami Shores would have been completely fine with it,” said their lawyer, Ari Bargil with the Institute of Justice.
“They should be equally free to grow food for their own consumption, which they did for 17 years before the village forced them to uproot the very source of their sustenance.”
In modern day America, growing your own food has now become a revolutionary act.” curated from http://thefreethoughtproject.com/judge-rules-govt-ban-vegetable-gardens/
I find this a little far reaching, don’t you? Isn’t the governments job to uphold the law, not make them up as they go?!?
I realize that there must be reasonable interpretation and enforcement, obviously. I mean if my definition of the pursuit of happiness was something that was harmful or potentially harmful to myself or others, then I am outside of the reasonable interpretation of the pursuit of happiness.
But I ask you, is there any way that growing a vegetable garden for food with no complaints about it should be banned? Or made illegal??